Taming the Fierce Energy of the Vacuum

Can the New Electrodynamics Incorporate Mind and Its Operations?

Mind and mind operations are electromagnetic in nature, but they are time-like. That is, they utilize time-polarized photons and waves, rather than the familiar EM transverse waves.

As quantum field theory shows, [43] the individual time-polarized EM photon (or wave) is not detectable, nor is the longitudinal EM wave. However, when combined, the two together are detectable as the instantaneous scalar potential.

"Time" is actually spatial EM energy compressed by c², and then removed from 3-space and placed on the time-axis where it becomes undetectable and what we call "time." If left in 3-space, the highly compressed EM energy is what we call "mass."

Time thus has the same energy density as mass. Thoughts and mind operations manipulate time energy alone, so they are normally not detectable. However, we have been able to specify the exact mind-body coupling mechanism, and to show how mental intent turns into ordinary EM signals in the nervous system, and from that into physical force in the body. We have also been able to show how the sense of self arises in the body-to-mind loop and mind-to-body loop delays, and how the sense of self as independent from the external world — while still perceiving that it is part of the external world — arises.

Unfortunately this entire area of the mind's "time-like or scalar" electrodynamics — called psychoenergetics by the Russians — has also been highly weaponized. That is beyond the scope of this article. However, we can say that it is already possible — and has been for some time — for some nations to directly engineer the human mind and its operations, even at a distance.[44] Our own perspective is that this area should be used to the betterment of humankind instead of to its detriment. Indeed, in my view we need an international treaty controlling the use of such "mind engineering" science, just as there are international treaties to control biological warfare and other weapons of mass destruction.

For an example of a beneficial purpose, we would envision a future time when education could be achieved by simply "loading the requisite software directly in the mind." At that time, every person on earth could be given a fine education in a variety of disciplines, multiple language capabilities, etc. There would be no lack of education or lack of qualification for a job, by any person on the planet. Alas, I do not expect to see such in my lifetime; too many forces are now dedicated to weaponizing it secretly, and using it to destroy humankind rather than freeing it.

Why Don't the Electrical Engineering Departments
Teach a More Modern Science?

Here the reader's assessment is as good as anyone else's. After more than a century, the standard Lorentz-regauged Maxwell-Heaviside equations have been so ingrained in electric engineering thought, that it has become an accepted dogma which everyone accepts without question. To use an appropriate phrase from Einstein, it is as if we "imbibed it with our mother's milk." Behind the scenes, of course, there are also very powerful financial interests — which Winston Churchill just loosely referred to as the "High Cabal" — with some trillions of dollars per year of income involved. These groups do not wish the present energy science and technology changed into something dramatic and cheap such as "fuel-free" electrical power systems extracting their energy from the vacuum. The decreed "progress" in power systems for the future has already been decided, and it is fuel cells and the more difficult hydrogen technology. This will keep the environmentalists off the cartels' backs, and allow them to show "progress being made to clean up the biosphere."

The bottom line is that it's still all about money and power, and "who's going to be the big monkey." Primate dominance is still one of the primary motivating forces in humankind, including in scientists and the scientific community.

The terrible bias in electromagnetic science toward that flawed old energy model, is guaranteed by the "scientific momentum" and inertia that the dogma has built up over more than a century. Science does not change its cherished dogmas by sweet reason, but by a vicious and sustained cur dog fight — and even then only after the "old dogs" die off and get out of the way. As Max Planck put it:[45]: "An important scientific innovation rarely makes its way by gradually winning over and converting its opponents: it rarely happens that Saul becomes Paul. What does happen is that its opponents gradually die out, and that the growing generation is familiarized with the ideas from the beginning."
Arthur C. Clarke said it this way:[46]

"If they [quantum fluctuations of vacuum] can be [tapped], the impact upon our civilization will be incalculable. Oil, coal, nuclear, hydropower, would become obsolete — and so would many of our worries about environmental pollution." "Don't sell your oil shares yet — but don't be surprised if the world again witnesses the four stages of response to any new and revolutionary development: 1. It's crazy! 2. It may be possible — so what? 3. I said it was a good idea all along. 4. I thought of it first."
It's a part of human nature to strongly resist new ideas, and particularly upsetting ideas. Even Sigmund Freud, the founder of modern psychology, pointed it out in these words:

"There are three steps in the history of a great discovery. First, its opponents say that the discoverer is crazy; later that he is sane but that his discovery is of no real importance; and last, that the discovery is important but everybody has known it right along."

Just now, COP>1.0 energy science and notions are still largely in that first stage prescribed by Freud, just a little bit into the second stage, and struggling to get on through the second stage and into the third.

A key problem is that all science must be patronized (funded). Someone must pay for the labs and the scientists, the equipment, the operations, etc. The scientific community is organized to strongly control that funding, and control what it can even be spent for.

When the research money is strongly controlled, scientific research itself is strongly controlled. So the real reason that this type of research does not happen is that managerial and control scientists are rewarded — often handsomely — for adhering to the status quo, and doing only "incremental improvements" rather than gigantic leaps. Scientists, graduate students, and post-docs are in fact destroyed or severely punished if they "wander off" into that old "perpetual motion machine nonsense" called COP>1.0 EM systems. The scientific "system" is set up that way, very much like a cartel, and it is self-enforcing and self-replicating. Scientists are allowed to work on only what they can attract funding for. They are only funded to work — mostly — on comfortable and already established things.

So ultimately the blame lies directly with the leaders of the scientific community, such as the National Science Foundation and the National Academy of Sciences, and the manner in which they advise the U.S. government to tailor its energy research money. Also, as a result the U.S. Patent Office still is very shy about granting any kind of patent that mentions or implies COP>1.0 EM systems. Such is simply assumed to be against the laws of nature and involving "perpetual motion nonsense," a priori.

Doesn't Present Circuit Theory Accurately Predict All Circuit Behavior?

Not on your life! Circuits do continue to exhibit anomalous behavior, and behavior that is not understood. Even many of the basic effects are not well understood. For example, there are about 200 known magnetic effects, and only about 100 are well understood. The level of understanding of the remainder varies from "somewhat understood" to "not understood at all."

For nonlinear circuits, the phenomenology can get very anomalous, e.g., quoting Ogorzalek:[47]

"All real systems are nonlinear in nature. This simple observation is true also for electrical and electronic circuits even though many of them are designed to perform linear transformations on signals. . . . in many cases the designed circuit, when implemented, performs in a very unexpected way, totally different from that for which it was designed. In most cases, engineers do not care about the origins and mechanisms of the malfunction; for them a circuit which does not perform as desired is of no use and has to rejected or redesigned . . . ."

" . . . electrical and electronic circuits constitute a group of real physical systems in which observations and measurements are relatively easy to make. . . . Such an 'experimental comfort' enabled thorough studies confirming the existence of strange unexpected behavior in almost every type of electronic circuit — oscillators, filters, instrumentation circuits, power supplies, PLLs, electric machines, microwave circuits, electro-optic systems, etc. The main problem remains in interpreting experimental data."
As another example, the "open path" discovered and utilized by Gabriel Kron,[48] one of our great electrical scientists, is still unknown today. Kron was never allowed to reveal the full exposé of his open path, where he could produce current between any two parts of a circuit, even though not connected. Lynn and Russell [49] pointed it out this way:

"Kron has never published details of his method of making the polyhedron self-organizing, although his published results show that in this state it has some remarkable properties, associated with harmonic integrals on multiply connected spaces."
For the uninitiated, in a multiply-connected space some energy can be in two or more places at the same time. Contrary to our intuition, some parts of physics really do work this way. Obviously, if one inputs 100 joules to one point in space, and it remains there but yet also appears simultaneously in another point in space, this appears to be "creation of energy" to the casual observer. It is not. Instead, it is a broken symmetry in energy conservation in single-connected space, resulting in a higher symmetry in multiply-connected space. Conservation of energy laws need not be as simple as our naïve intuition would have us believe at first blush.

Energy in multiply connected spaces is often referred to as a quantum potential. Bohm's great hidden variable theory of quantum mechanics [50] uses the quantum potential, and it poses things eventually engineerable that are presently deemed impossible. His theory gives all the proper predictions and answers to the current problems and experiments, and it is equally as valid as the present much more limited Bohr interpretation. Indeed, Bohm's theory seems to gain ground with every passing year.[51]

Why Don't Scientists and Engineers Develop Power Systems That Extract Our Electrical Energy Freely from the Vacuum?

As stated, they simply cannot obtain funding to do the research and get it done. They cannot teach it, for it would not be allowed. Further, if they try to do it on their own, they get no funding, their papers are refused publication, and their peers destroy them. Eventually they will be lucky to be employed in a fast food restaurant.

The system has become "self-policing" of its own cherished dogma. The reviewers definitely deny an applicant funding if the project submitted would be an embarrassment to their own self-interest. For instance, Charles McCutchen, a physicist with the NIH, puts it this way: "[Peers on the panel reviewing a grant applicant] profit by his success in drawing money into their collective field, and by his failure to do revolutionary research that would lower their own ranking in the profession. It is in their interest to approve expensive, pedestrian proposals."

Well, surely the scientific journals will readily publish innovative new things, will they not? Again, not so. To quote George:[52]

" . . . I suggest that most revolutions in science have taken place outside the lofty arena of the refereed journals, and with good reason. The philosophy by which these journals govern themselves virtually precludes publication of ideas that challenge an existing consensus."
In that respect, the publication of two papers by the Alpha Foundation's Institute for Advanced Study (AIAS) in Foundations of Physics Letters, on a COP>1.0 EM system, was nothing short of miraculous. With the publication of several other AIAS papers dealing with energy from the vacuum,[53] a small salient in the solid opposition of the journals appears to have at last been opened. But there is a very, very long way to go before such papers can be published readily, even when meticulously prepared and scientifically impeccable.

Why does not one paper do it? Why is such a volume of papers needed? As Landauer puts it:[54]

"We used to be able to say things once; if the message was reasonable, it had a good chance of becoming a permanent part of the structure of the field. Today, a single publication is lost; if we say it only once, it will be presumed that we have changed our mind, and we therefore must publish repeatedly. This further fuels the large publication volume that requires us to repeat."
Actually this is one somewhat unfortunate aspect of science's success and growth. Quoting Price, nearly four decades ago:[55]

"Using any reasonable definition of a scientist, we can say that between 80 and 90 per cent of all the scientists that have ever lived are alive now. Now depending on what one measures and how, the crude size of science in manpower or publications tends to double within a period of 10 to 15 years."
In short, because of the sheer bulk of the scientific literature and its ever-expanding volume, the subject of a paper can just be lost in the wilderness, unless it is extensively published in many papers, and in multiple journals.

In the field of permissible COP>1.0 power systems, still struggling to be born, the resistance assumes a more sinister, Taliban-like character. The proponent is assaulted with a viciousness seldom equaled in the annals of scientific history. Few can survive such an onslaught. Here is a direct example of the type of savage assault made upon a cold fusion scientist — and at a time when cold fusion had achieved more than 600 successful experiments by multiple scientists in multiple labs in several nations:

"How stupid do you think we are? My assessment of you and your colleagues is that you are complete frauds or totally mad. There is no known physical principle that would support the kind of results that you claim your technology can accomplish, nor is there any credible argument why there should be such a principle.
Any historian of science can cite many dozens of incidents where ruthless suppression of new and important scientific discoveries has been done by the scientific community itself. Science has and continues to have a dark history in that respect.

How Will "Electrical Energy from the Vacuum" Science Eventually Get Started?

It will get started when one or more of the inventors and researchers somehow succeeds in getting sufficient funding and scientific support (he will have to pay the scientists himself) to develop a simple, rugged, easily replicable COP>1.0 electrical power system and place it on the world market. Even then, he will have to do it outside the United States, in all probability. Otherwise, the U.S. scientific establishment will destroy him, by fair means or foul. And we do mean foul. Jim Watson demonstrated an 8 kilowatt practical self-powering generator system at a national conference, and then apparently received "the offer he could not refuse." He and his family simply dropped out of sight, and severed all further contact with his friends, including this author. He and his family are still alive, fortunately, but remaining very, very quiet. There are no Watson systems on the open market, and there are not going to be.

Steve Marinov was killed in a foreign country with a longitudinal EM wave "shooter," and his body was thrown from the top of a building to suggest a suicide. The body was left there for an extended period by the authorities, who knew it was emitting longitudinal EM radiation for awhile. Where the body lay on the concrete, the cement glowed. There is only one weapon on earth that will kill a body in such fashion: a longitudinal EM wave shooter. At least 10 nations of the world have developed longitudinal EM wave weapons. These are almost certainly the weapons to which Secretary of Defense Cohen referred in 1997 as follows:[56]

"Others [terrorists] are engaging even in an eco-type of terrorism whereby they can alter the climate, set off earthquakes, volcanoes remotely through the use of electromagnetic waves . . . So there are plenty of ingenious minds out there that are at work finding ways in which they can wreak terror upon other nations . . . It's real, and that's the reason why we have to intensify our [counterterrorism] efforts."
Floyd Sweet was fired at from about 300 yards by a would-be assassin, using a silenced rifle. Being old, he stumbled and fell on the steps just as the assassin pulled the trigger. The bullet snapped right by his ear, where his head had just been. Thereafter, Sweet was deeply paranoid about taking the unit outside his own apartment, or in actually trying to develop it. Again, I personally worked with Sweet for some years.

The present author has had his own share of such shenanigans, close calls, and suppressions, more than a dozen times, but does not wish to publicize the incidents. As a single personal example, Kawai's patented motor [57] will produce COP>1.0 if his process is applied to a high-efficiency magnetic motor to start with (such as one with 70% to 80% efficiency). We explained the Kawai engine's operation, placed it on the Internet, and Kawai and party came to Huntsville to see us. At Kawai's urging, we negotiated an agreement with him that we would manufacture and market his systems worldwide; he already had build a closed-loop, self-powering system in Japan. He would fund the entire project.

Our agreement was verbally reached on a Thursday afternoon, late. That night a jet arrived posthaste from Los Angeles, with a Yakuza on board. The next morning Kawai and his party were in fear and trembling, and the Yakuza was in total control. Kawai no longer controlled his own company, his invention, or his own fate. Needless to say, the Yakuza coldly cancelled the agreement, point blank. This happened in front of my associates and I, so there are multiple witnesses. The Yakuza and party quickly packed up the two Kawai engines in our possession, and departed. No Kawai engine will ever be permitted on the world market. Several other Japanese COP>1.0 electrical power systems have also been suppressed by the Yakuza.[58] Many such incidents — including murder — have occurred over the last decades, right here in the United States. Others will happen.

The single thing that is likely to finally force COP>1.0 systems out there is the Internet. For the first time, researchers can exchange information worldwide and on a vast scale. My own website, www.cheniere.org, is an example of a tired old dog, trying to get out important information he has discovered — or believes he has discovered — and make it available freely to students, professors, scientists, and researchers that are interested. Jean-Lous Naudin's website is another example. There are many others.

Of course, there is a great deal of disinformation on the web as well as information. The reader still has to sift it for himself. In my own case, I extensively cite the references I use, and the interested party can check them himself to see if they say what I said they did. In short, the idea is to educate, not dogmatize. It is also intended to give the interested young researcher what I have uncovered in thirty years of very hard work, so he does not have to rediscover all the wheels again, so to speak. He can simply start from where I am and go much further. It is very heartening that many other researchers are doing the same thing and sharing what they have uncovered. In my own case, I have also labored very hard to lay a sound basis for a legitimate theory of permissible COP>1.0 EM systems. That effort will culminate with the publication of my book late this year.[59]

As more researchers succeed, eventually this thing will finally acquire enough momentum to "get born." When the scientific community finally turns the sharp young graduate students and post-docs loose on it, and funds them, it will simply explode into science and technology like a skyrocket. Then, of course, it will be just as Planck and Freud stated. Suddenly, not only has everyone known it all along, but they did it first.

But it will get born. If it doesn't, the "dirt economics" in poor nations with fanatical leaders will generate wars and world terrorism. The terrorists will see to it that humanity destroys or nearly destroys itself during the first half of this century, and perhaps even by the end of the first decade. It is not accidental that President George Bush has declared war on terrorism.

Every nation must soon get cheap clean electrical energy from the vacuum and develop self-powering electrical power systems quickly, or no nation will ever be safe again. Radicals and terrorists will see to it, if we lose the energy war.

So COP>1.0 electrical power systems have become both a moral imperative and a national imperative, in my opinion. Either we develop them and establish them worldwide or we perish, as simple as that. If enough of us determine to do it, and if we hang together and get a little funding — and if we have a little luck — hopefully it will be accomplished.